California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Adv. Council v. James Rowland, Director, James H. Gomez, Sara Bruce, Leslie Bandaccari

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Section 1915 6 typically requires the reviewing court to exercise its sound discretion in determining 7 whether the affiant has satisfied the statute’s requirement of indigency”
• holding that “Section 26 1915 typically requires the reviewing court to exercise its sound discretion in determining 27 whether the affiant has satisfied the statute’s requirement of indigency”
• holding that “Section 1915 9 typically requires the reviewing court to exercise its sound discretion in determining 10 whether the affiant has satisfied the statute’s requirement of indigency”
• holding that “Section 28 1915 typically requires the reviewing court to exercise its sound discretion in determining 1 whether the affiant has satisfied the statute’s requirement of indigency”
• holding that “Section 1915 typically requires the reviewing court to 15 exercise its sound discretion in determining whether the affiant has satisfied the 16 statute’s requirement of indigency”
• holding that 12 “[s]ection 1915 typically requires the reviewing court to exercise its sound discretion in 13 determining whether the affiant has satisfied the statute’s requirement on indigency”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).