· 7/20/1992
California Federal Bank v. Matreyek
Citations
- 8 Cal. App. 4th 125
- 10 Cal. Rptr. 2d 58
- 92 Daily Journal DAR 10057
- 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6399
- 1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 917
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding restitutionary recovery inequitable where the bank would be able to retain both a benefit and a profit
- holding restitutionary recovery inequitable where the bank would be able to retain both a benefit and a profit
- in terms of an unjust 13 enrichment claim, “benefit” means any form of advantage, and is not limited to money paid to the 14 recipient by the party seeking restitution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.