Skip to main content
· 7/20/1992

California Federal Bank v. Matreyek

Citations

  • 8 Cal. App. 4th 125
  • 10 Cal. Rptr. 2d 58
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 10057
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6399
  • 1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 917

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding restitutionary recovery inequitable where the bank would be able to retain both a benefit and a profit
  • holding restitutionary recovery inequitable where the bank would be able to retain both a benefit and a profit
  • in terms of an unjust 13 enrichment claim, “benefit” means any form of advantage, and is not limited to money paid to the 14 recipient by the party seeking restitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.