Skip to main content
· 7/25/1991

California Electric Co. v. Briley

Citations

  • 939 F.2d 790
  • 6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1355
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5927
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 9013
  • 138 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2095
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 15925
  • 1991 WL 134600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying habeas relief despite conflicting eyewitness reports that diminished the certainty of on-scene identifications of Foy
  • finding defendant guilty of two armed robberies where the gun used belonged to defendant’s father and defendant drove the getaway car after the second robbery, even though no direct evidence connected the defendant to the first robbery
  • inmate’s own carelessness or lack of diligence does not provide a basis for relief under Rule 60(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boochever, Noonan, Tang

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.