Skip to main content
· 1/27/2006

California Department of Water Resources v. Calpine Corp.

Citations

  • 337 B.R. 27
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3300
  • 2006 WL 213488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the rejection of a filed contract was a collateral attack on the filed rate and thus within FERC’s exclusive jurisdiction, not the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court
  • “A solvent company could not choose to stop performance and expect anything other than swift FERC action.”
  • “Both the Mirant decision and the FERC Order predicate bankruptcy court jurisdiction to reject energy contracts on the belief that the public interest is adequately considered at a rejection hearing, at least in part through FERC's participation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.