Skip to main content
· 1/23/2007

California Commerce Casino, Inc. v. Schwarzenegger

Citations

  • 53 Cal. Rptr. 3d 626
  • 146 Cal. App. 4th 1406
  • 2007 Daily Journal DAR 1084
  • 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 871
  • 2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 80

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiffs’ claims that the bonds violated the California constitution “were an attack on the validity of the [bonds] and therefore should have been raised in a reverse validation action within 60 days”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.