Calhoun v. Teal
Citations
- 106 La. 47
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>Where there exists error of fact, proceeding either from ignorance of that which really exists, or from a mistaken belief in the existence of that which has none, and this error was the principal cause of, and bore upon the motive for, yielding consent to a certain business agreement, relief against it may be had.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying plaintiffs’ procedural due process claims because “[t]he trial de novo provision clearly afford[s] full procedural due process” (quoting Ibrahim, 834 F.2d at 54)
- finding implausible that a small location with one cash register, no optical scanner, and a limited stock would be able to run multiple high value transactions within a short period of time
- noting nothing prohibited the USDA from “solely” relying upon EBT transaction reports
- \the Court agrees with FNS' conclusion that the 'disproportional amount of transactions that end in a same cent value' appear 'contrived.'\
- “Plaintiffs . . . bear the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the agency’s action was invalid.”
- recipients making multiple transactions in unusually short time frames, recipients making excessively large purchase transactions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blanchard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.