Calhoun v. Ford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is not necessary therefore that a claimant under the forfeiture statute allege ownership. A lesser property interest such as possession creates standing.”
• “The moving party’s label for its motion is not controlling. Rather, the court will construe it, however styled, to be the type proper for relief requested.” (citation omitted)
• lesser property interest than ownership, such as possession can create standing
• “[T]he 26 moving party’s label for its motion is not controlling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).