Calhoun v. Bordenkircher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “little weight is to be given [to third-party] registrations in evaluating whether there is likelihood of confusion” because “[t]he ex- istence of these registrations is not evidence of what hap- pens in the market place or that customers are familiar with them”
• finding a family of marks based on the formative “FISH” for names of boats as in “SAIL FISH” and “SUNFISH”
• “The existence of [third party] registrations is not evidence of what happens in the market place or that customers are familiar with them-”
• \little weight is to be given such registrations in evaluating whether there is likelihood of confusion.\
• \little weight is to be given such registrations in evaluating whether there is likelihood of confusion.\
• \The existence of [third party] registrations is not evidence of what happens in the market place or that customers are familiar with them\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).