Calero v. Unisys Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the privilege does not apply to plaintiffs allegations of “harassment and discrimination” by a manager
• concluding that an award of costs and fees was not warranted because “removal was based on reasonable and supported interpretation of unsettled California law”
• stating that under the FEHA, “[a]lthough individual managers cannot be held personally liable for discriminatory ‘personnel decisions’ [under the FEHA], they may be held personally liable for unlawful ‘harassment’”
• “There is no authority for the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JS-6 / REMAND CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Case No. CV 19-5793-DMG (FFMx
• “Tort recovery pursued via a separate civil action is permitted if the conduct of the employer has a ‘questionable’ relationship to the employment or where the employer steps out of his proper role.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Onelum v. Best Buy Stores L.P.
  C.D. California· 2013-05-30· cited 24×
• Sanchez v. Lane Bryant, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2015-08-17· cited 18×
• Erhart v. BofI Holding, Inc.
  S.D. California· 2017-09-11· cited 14×
• Hernandez v. Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc.
  E.D. California· 2013-01-09· cited 12×
• Lighting Science Group Corp. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
  E.D. California· 2008-06-03· cited 5×
• In re Gen. Capacitor
  N.D. California· 2018-06-29

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
  California Supreme Court· 2001-07-11· cited 2,941×
• Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis
  Supreme Court· 1996-12-10· cited 2,132×
• Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 1988-12-29· cited 948×
• Joe B. RITCHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN DRUG COMPANY; William Dement, Defendants-Appellees
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-04-03· cited 482×
• Samuel \Wesley\ McCabe and John Elson v. General Foods Corporation, Alan Moltz, Abner Ladson and Does 1-100
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-05-18· cited 459×
• Reno v. Baird
  California Supreme Court· 1998-07-16· cited 348×
• Shoemaker v. Myers
  California Supreme Court· 1990-12-20· cited 323×
• Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1998-08-31· cited 294×
• Gantt v. Sentry Insurance
  California Supreme Court· 1992-02-27· cited 294×
• Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection District
  California Supreme Court· 1987-01-02· cited 291×
• Janken v. GM Hughes Electronics
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-06-05· cited 272×
• Richard J. Dodson v. Spiliada Maritime Corp.
  Fifth Circuit· 1992-01-02· cited 248×
• Harriet M. Gould, an Unremarried Widow v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, a Foreign Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-05-28· cited 195×
• Imperial Ice Co. v. Rossier
  California Supreme Court· 1941-04-29· cited 178×
• Duncan v. Stuetzle
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-02-21· cited 169×
• Lenk v. Total-Western, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2001-06-04· cited 132×
• CHARLES J. VACANTI v. State Comp. Ins. Fund
  California Supreme Court· 2001-01-04· cited 129×
• Livitsanos v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1992-05-18· cited 114×
• Plute v. Roadway Package System, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2001-04-18· cited 110×
• Kiseskey v. Carpenters' Trust for Southern California
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-06-22· cited 80×