Caleb Moore v. Van Shaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court could not consider the trial judge’s statements about a ease that took place over ten years prior
• concluding that a judge could not testify in a habeas proceeding with respect to his thought process regarding the sentence being challenged
• statement made by sentencing judge ten years later regarding judge’s thought processes at time of sentencing must not be considered in habeas proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).