· 5/28/1974
Cale J. Holder, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Indiana v. Arthur Banks
Citations
- 417 U.S. 187
- 94 S. Ct. 2594
- 40 L. Ed. 2d 754
- 1974 U.S. LEXIS 61
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allegations of repetitive use of litigation timed and designed to prevent plaintiff from establishing business competing with defendant
- “repetitive use of litigation . timed and designed principally to . preserve defendant’s monopoly,” 360 F.Supp. 451.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.