Skip to main content
· 4/15/1883

Caldwell v. White

Citations

  • 77 Mo. 471

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding worker to be employee where intent of oral contract was the only factor court found favoring independent contractor relationship and other factors outweighed the intent factor
  • “if an insurance policy contains an exclusion purporting to limit a broad general grant of coverage, the exclusion must be ‘in terms which would effectively convey [it] to a reasonable person in the position of the insured.’”
  • “if an insurance policy contains an exclusion purporting to limit a broad general grant of coverage, the exclusion must be ‘in terms which would effectively convey [it] to a reasonable person in the position of the insured.’”
  • whether worker was employee or subcontractor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.