Caldwell v. Lawrence
Citations
- 84 Ill. 161
Syllabus
<p>1. Parties—in suit on promissory note—equitable ownership. In a suit by the indorsee of a promissory note, a plea that the plaintiff had, for a valuable consideration, redelivered the note to the payee, is bad on demurrer, unless it shows defendant has some defense to the note</p> <p>2. A suit on a promissory note is properly brought in the name of the person in whom the legal title to the note is vested, and it is a matter of no cons.equence, so far as defendant is concerned, who may be the equitable owner of the note, if he has no defense to it.</p> <p>3. Pleading—decla/ration on assigned note. In a suit upon a promissory note by an assignee, it is not necessary to allege that the indorsement was made upon any particular day, even though the indorsement was in fact dated.</p>
Judges: Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Roberts v. SnowNebraska Supreme Court· 1889-10-03· cited 14×
- Kazunas v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois· 1936-10-13· cited 9×
- Feulner v. GillamAppellate Court of Illinois· 1918-05-15· cited 6×
- Hoff v. DoughertyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1927-01-20· cited 5×
- Linney v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1896-06-04· cited 4×
- Jenkins v. ShermanMississippi Supreme Court· 1900-03-15· cited 4×
- Brown v. GriffinAppellate Court of Illinois· 1891-05-05· cited 1×
- Forster v. Second National Bank of New AlbanyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1895-12-12· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.