Skip to main content
· 7/22/1992

Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.

Citations

  • 489 N.W.2d 353
  • 1992 S.D. LEXIS 103
  • 1992 WL 175129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that while there is a “general rule” that testimony of a vocational expert is required, “there may be cases where an expert’s testimony on loss of use, over and above a medical impairment, may be only advisable rather than essential”
  • discussion of what employee must prove to establish causal connection and right to compensation
  • discussion of what employee must prove to establish causal connection and right to compensation
  • “When an appeal of an administrative agency’s decision in a contested matter is taken to circuit court and the final judgment of that court is appealed to this court, we must make the same review of the agency’s actions as did the circuit court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Henderson, Sabers, Amundson, Johns, Wuest

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.