Caldwell v. Hurley
Citations
- 41 Wash. 296
- 83 P. 318
- 1906 Wash. LEXIS 957
Syllabus
<p>Bills and Notes — Indorsees Before Delivery as Co-sureties. Stockholders of a corporation who indorse the company’s note before delivery for the purpose of enabling the company to borrow money for use in its business, are prima facie joint makers who are in fact co-sureties.</p> <p>Same — Payment by One Co-surety — Contribution. An action for contribution lies between endorsers before delivery who sign a promissory note as prima facie makers and in fact as co-sureties of the principal maker.</p> <p>Limitation of Actions — Contribution of Co-surety — Implied Liability — Written Agreement. An action for contribution between co-sureties upon a promissory note is upon an implied liability arising out of an express contract, and is controlled by Bal. Code, § 4798, prescribing a limitation of six years for the commencement thereof.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Legislature sets statute of limitations periods to encompass various classes of actions
- noting that Legislature sets statute of limitations periods to encompass various classes of actions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cbow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Seattle Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1919-01-22· cited 30×
- Warren v. RicklesWashington Supreme Court· 1924-05-01· cited 23×
- Lindblom v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court· 1916-07-11· cited 22×
- Halver v. WelleWashington Supreme Court· 1954-02-19· cited 19×
- Societe Nouvelle D'armement v. BarnabyNinth Circuit· 1917-10-15· cited 15×
- Pratt v. PrattWashington Supreme Court· 1922-09-22· cited 13×
- Pietz v. IndermuehleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-01-16· cited 12×
- Pietz v. IndermuehleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-02-27· cited 11×
- Pioneer Mining & Ditch Co. v. DavidsonWashington Supreme Court· 1920-06-07· cited 11×
- Evans v. Yakima Valley, Grape Growers Ass'nWashington Supreme Court· 1958-07-24· cited 8×
- Davis v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-12-11· cited 7×
- Davis v. Davis Wright Tremaine, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-12-11· cited 7×
- Grismer v. Merger Mines CorporationE.D. Washington· 1942-03-21· cited 6×
- Evans v. YAKIMA ETC. ASS'N.Washington Supreme Court· 1958-07-24
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.