Caldwell v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting the District’s 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss where plaintiff alleged that prison officers were inadequately trained, and that its emergency policy was inadequate, as those boilerplate legal conclusions were unsupported by facts
• pro se plaintiffs inferences “need not be accepted if such inferences are unsupported by the facts set out in the complaint”
• in securities fraud action, court refused defendants' submission of 4 Notably, the defendants have failed to identify case authority for the proposition that the court is required to take cognizance of extraneous materials when ruling on a 12(b)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).