Skip to main content
· 12/8/2006

Caldwell Tanks, Inc. v. Haley & Ward, Inc.

Citations

  • 471 F.3d 210
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 30118
  • 2006 WL 3542235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding Massachusetts law contains no assumption that indemnity provisions are restricted to third-party claims
  • defining “indemnity” as “[a] duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another” (emphasis omitted)
  • “[W]here material facts are not in dispute, interpretation of an indemnity clause is an issue of law.”
  • “[I]t is well accepted under Massachusetts law that parties may alter the American rule by contract . . . [t]he Contract here explicitly allowed for recovery of defense costs, including attorney’s fees.” (internal citations omitted)
  • “[I]ndemnification provisions are construed in accordance with their ordinary and plain meaning[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Campbell, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.