· 12/8/2006
Caldwell Tanks, Inc. v. Haley & Ward, Inc.
Citations
- 471 F.3d 210
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 30118
- 2006 WL 3542235
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding Massachusetts law contains no assumption that indemnity provisions are restricted to third-party claims
- defining “indemnity” as “[a] duty to make good any loss, damage, or liability incurred by another” (emphasis omitted)
- “[W]here material facts are not in dispute, interpretation of an indemnity clause is an issue of law.”
- “[I]t is well accepted under Massachusetts law that parties may alter the American rule by contract . . . [t]he Contract here explicitly allowed for recovery of defense costs, including attorney’s fees.” (internal citations omitted)
- “[I]ndemnification provisions are construed in accordance with their ordinary and plain meaning[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Selya, Campbell, Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.