Skip to main content
· 6/1/1931

Calderon v. United Fruit Co.

Citations

  • 50 F.2d 1073
  • 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 4660

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an unlimited CBA was a document of a different nature that a single-project agreement
  • holding persons have a “basic responsibility . . . to review a document before signing it”
  • “If, as to the issue on which summary judgment is sought, there is any evidence in the record from which a reasonable inference could be drawn in favor of the opposing party, summary judgment is improper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.