Calderon v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that step-four determination implicitly reached by remanding court could be changed on remand for \ 'cogent' and 'compelling' reasons\
• “In short, [the hearing officer] disavowed his prior step-four determination, thereby obviating the need to address the step-five error identified in the Court’s [memorandum and order].”
• “the Court’s mandate was merely to correct a procedural error in [the] step-five determination; it was not an invitation to revisit the [earlier] decision in its entirety”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).