Calderon-Serra v. Wilimington Trust Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying leave to amend because of undue delay where appellants previously amended their complaint and sought permission to file second amended complaint nearly a year after the action commenced and months after the motions to dismiss were fully briefed
• “Appreciable delay alone, in the absence of good reason for it, is enough to justify denying a motion for leave to amend.”
• “Appreciable delay alone, in the absence of good reason for it, is enough to justify denying a motion for leave to amend.”
• “The good cause standard typically will not be met where the party 19 seeking to modify the scheduling order has been aware of the facts and theories supporting 20 amendment since the inception of the action”
• identifying futility as grounds for denying motion to amend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).