Calculators Hawaii, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Brandt, Inc. And Reynold M. Hallett, Cross-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Rule 52(b) motion made after court indicates action it will take but before entry of judgment is timely
• “The district court properly found per se analysis inappropriate 8 because Brandt and Hallett were not competitors. Any ‘group boycott’ therefore 9 consisted of a vertical agreement, to which the rule of reason applies.”
• “The district court properly 21 found per se analysis inappropriate because Brandt and Hallett were not competitors. 22 Any ‘group boycott’ therefore consisted of a vertical agreement, to which the rule of 1 reason applies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).