Cal-Agrex, Inc. v. Tassell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion for new trial on basis of reference to CCRB investigation, finding it was not convinced that “the jury necessarily drew any inferences about the results of the CCRB investigation, and find[ing] [defendant's contention to the contrary to be speculative”
• granting qualified immunity on defendant’s post-trial Rule 50(b) motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).