Caiola v. Caiola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff who did not hire a substitute bus but rather used one of its reserves could still recover for loss of use
• absent decision by Court of Appeals, trial court is bound by decision of Appellate Division in its own Department although decision of another Department must be followed if trial court’s own Department has not ruled
• “There is no logical or practical reason why a distinction should be drawn between cases in which a substitute vehicle is actually hired and those in which the plaintiff utilizes a spare.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).