Cain v. Union Central Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[a]n ALJ’s decision on the merits of a disability application does not become final and binding if the Appeals Council vacates that decision and remands the matter for further proceedings”
• listing cases as follows “Compare Miller v. Barnhart, 175 Fed.Appx. 952, 956 (10th Cir.2006
• “An ALJ’s decision on the merits of a disability application does not become final and binding if the Appeals Council vacates that decision and remands the matter for further proceedings.”
• “An ALJ’s decision on the merits of a disability application does not become final and binding if the Appeals Council vacates that decision and remands the matter for further proceedings.”
• “An ALJ’s decision on the merits of a disability application does not become final and binding if the Appeals Council vacates that decision and remands the matter for further proceedings.”
• “An ALJ’s decision on the merits of a 10 disability application does not become final . . . if the Appeals Council vacates that 11 decision and remands the matter for further proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).