Texas Supreme Court· 7/1/1857
Cain v. State
Citations
- 20 Tex. 355
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting limited circumstances justifying a presumption that the Legislature intended its acts passed at the same session to \abrogate and annul one another\
- prosecution is prohibited for what was an offense at common law, but not made penal by our statutes
- prosecution is prohibited for what was an offense at common law, but not made penal by our statutes
- prosecution is prohibited for what was an offense at common law, but not made penal by our statutes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts, Wheeler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Grunsfeld v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-10-28· cited 267×
- Wichita County, Texas v. HartTexas Supreme Court· 1996-04-12· cited 265×
- State v. MedranoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-02-06· cited 227×
- State v. DyerTexas Supreme Court· 1947-03-26· cited 84×
- Martin v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court· 1947-04-16· cited 62×
- Billingslea v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-11-22· cited 48×
- First Nat. Bank of Giddings v. Lee County Cotton Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals· 1925-06-27· cited 43×
- Hammock v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2006-12-14· cited 41×
- Railroad Commission v. Texas & New Orleans R.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1931-10-14· cited 39×
- Fortinberry v. State ex rel. MyersTexas Commission of Appeals· 1926-04-07· cited 26×
- Chafin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-02-21· cited 24×
- Tunstall v. WormleyTexas Supreme Court· 1881-03-14· cited 24×
- Selman v. WolfeTexas Supreme Court· 1863-07-01· cited 21×
- Hanrick v. HanrickTexas Supreme Court· 1880-12-14· cited 21×
- Laughter v. SeelaTexas Supreme Court· 1883-03-17· cited 20×
- Walser v. JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1899-05-09· cited 16×
- Ex parte ModeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1915-10-13· cited 15×
- Price v. ColeTexas Supreme Court· 1872-07-01· cited 14×
- City of Lansing v. Board of State AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court· 1896-12-24· cited 13×
- St. Louis & Southwestern Railway Co. v. J. A. Kay & Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1893-06-01· cited 12×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.