Cain v. St. Louis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claimant collecting social security and a retirement pension must have his disability compensation suspended because he has voluntarily left the labor market
• benefits suspended because of voluntary retirement; employer relieved of burden of showing claimant had no intention of returning to work
• “It is clear that disability benefits must be suspended when a claimant voluntarily leaves the labor market upon retirement.”
• \It is clear that disability benefits must be suspended when a claimant voluntarily leaves the labor market upon retirement.\
• \An employer should not be required to show that a claimant has no intention of continuing to work; such a burden of proof would be prohibitive.\
• “An employer should not be required to show that a claimant has no intention of continuing to work; such a burden of proof would be prohibitive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).