Skip to main content

Cain v. Price

Citations

  • 415 P.3d 25

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that where a district court's order granting summary judgment is reversed, it is no longer appropriate to consider the respondents the prevailing party, and an award of attorney fees is inappropriate
  • explaining that where a district court's order granting summary judgment is reversed, it is no longer appropriate to consider the respondents the prevailing party, and an award of attorney fees is inappropriate
  • explaining that where a district court's order granting summary judgment is reversed, it is no longer appropriate to consider the respondents the prevailing party, and an award of attorney fees is inappropriate
  • explaining that where a district court's order granting summary judgment is reversed, it is no longer appropriate to consider the respondents the prevailing party, and an award of attorney fees is inappropriate
  • applying Nevada law and characterizing a release as a “promise” and holding that material breach relieved party of that promise
  • relying on Restatement in resolving issues regarding terms of a settlement 23 agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardesty, Parraguirre, Stiglich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.