Cain v. Levy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Finding no evidence of an intent to authorize or 11 deny a damages action, nor any factors strongly favoring the recognition of a constitutional tort, 12 the Court concludes that article I, section 13 does not confer an action for money damages.”
• “sections 7 and 13 26 do not confer private rights of action for [monetary] damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).