Cain v. Horne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the parties did not dispute the funds at issue constituted \public funds\ within the meaning of the state constitution's no aid provision, where they \are withdrawn from the public treasury\
• noting the parties did not dispute the funds at issue constituted \public funds\ within the meaning of the state constitution's no aid provision, where they \are withdrawn from the public treasury\
• noting the parties did not dispute the funds at issue constituted \public funds\ within the meaning of the state constitution's no aid provision, where they \are withdrawn from the public treasury\
• refusing to apply a \true beneficiary theory exception\ to find the individuals benefit rather than the institution receiving the public funds because such a holding \would nullify the Aid Clause's clear prohibition against the use of public funds to aid private or sectarian education\
• refusing to apply a \true beneficiary theory exception\ to find the individuals benefit rather than the institution receiving the public funds because such a holding \would nullify the Aid Clause's clear prohibition against the use of public funds to aid private or sectarian education\
• refusing to apply a \true beneficiary theory exception\ to find the individuals benefit rather than the institution receiving the public funds because such a holding \would nullify the Aid Clause's clear prohibition against the use of public funds to aid private or sectarian education\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).