Cain v. Cain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An appealing party is not permitted to vicariously assert that a non-party’s constitutional due process rights were violated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cain v. Cain
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-22· cited 8×
• UBS Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Lacava
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-29· cited 4×
• U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Cotton
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-29· cited 2×
• Cain v. Cain
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-30

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Perales v. Nino
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1977-11-30· cited 446×
• Purvis v. Hazelbaker
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-12-22· cited 12×