Cain Petroleum Inc. v. ZURICH AMERICAN INS., CO.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “ambiguity” is a term of art referring to multiple, reasonable interpretations of the policy.
• explaining that “‘[a]mbiguity’ is a term of art . . . refer[ring] to multiple, reasonable interpretations of the policy wording in light of the context in which the disputed provisions are employed and in the context of the policy as a whole.” (emphasis in original)
• explaining that “‘ambiguity’ is a term of art . . . refer[ring] to multiple, reasonable interpretations of the policy wording in light of the context in which the disputed provisions are employed and in the context of the policy as a whole.” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).