Skip to main content
· 9/12/1961

Caillouet v. The Tug Jackie G

Citations

  • 196 F. Supp. 951
  • 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “[a]bsent clear, controlling authority, the Court is not persuaded that a Magistrate Judge’s ruling granting a motion to amend a complaint is dispositive under the generally accepted criteria defining the term.”
  • allowing joinder of additional party where “the claims against [it] are virtually identical to those against the other defendants”
  • finding judicial economy favored adding new defendant where the “claims against [new defendant] are identical to those already in the case”
  • finding lack of prejudice because additional discovery would not be extensive due to new claims having “virtually identical” facts to initial claims
  • “[T]he burden on the current defendants of attending reopened depositions would be less because they have previously prepared for them.”
  • good cause for the delay where defendant “reasonably waited until it could inquire further into the” counterclaims “before moving to add” a new defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.