Cahoon v. Alton Packaging Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a federal civil rights claim must be prosecuted under the same procedure applicable to a state civil-rights claim
• holding that a federal civil rights claim must be prosecuted under the same procedure applicable to a state civil rights claim
• holding that a federal civil rights claim must be prosecuted under the same procedure applicable to a state civil-rights claim
• holding that a federal civil rights claim must be prosecuted under the same procedure applicable to a state civil rights claim
• refusing to apply the doctrine of legislative acquiescence to the Cahoon interpretation of the IHRA’s jurisdiction-stripping provision
• “the plain language of Section 8-111(C) requires that an Illinois court dismiss [a federal age discrimination] case unless state administrative remedies have been exhausted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).