Cahn v. Baccich & De Montluzin

Citations

• 137 La. 4
• 68 So. 193

Syllabus

<p>(Syllabus by the CourtJ</p> <p>Apegad and Error <§=^382 — Devolutive Appeai>-B ond — Sufficiency.</p> <p>Where the appellants obtained an order for both a devolutive and a suspensive appeal, and the bond for the devolutive appeal was fixed at $100 and for the suspensive appeal according- to law, and the appellants gave bond and security for $4,000, held that the bond, though not good for a suspensive, was amply good for a devolutive, appeal, and that the obtainment by appellants of a subsequent order for a devolutive appeal, and the giving of two bonds to perfect the same, were mere surplusage,</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 2036-2041; Dec. Dig. 382.]</p>