Cahill v. Eastern Benefit Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that employee did not show actual reliance because it was employer’s insurer, and not employee, who relied on misrepresentation of medical review organization
• concluding that employee did not show actual reliance because it was employer’s insurer, and not employee, who relied on misrepresentation of medical review organization
• finding that plaintiffs complaint failed to allege a valid cause of action in tort against a defendant agent where plaintiff did not allege any facts that would show that the agent owed him an independent duty of care
• finding that plaintiff’s complaint failed to allege a valid cause of action in tort against a defendant agent where plaintiff did not allege any facts that would show that the agent owed him an independent duty of care
• “The critical inquiry centers on the intention of the parties, which is to be gleaned from the language of the contract and the circumstances surrounding the parties at the time of its execution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).