Illinois Supreme Court· 1/19/1949
Cahill v. Cahill
Citations
- 84 N.E.2d 380
- 402 Ill. 416
- 1949 Ill. LEXIS 254
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing attorney fees where a remainder to “heirs of blood” presented a serious question in construction of a will
- there is a presumption in favor of the heir where there is an ambiguity in a will
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Orme v. Northern Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1962-05-25· cited 46×
- Dillman v. DillmanIllinois Supreme Court· 1951-05-24· cited 23×
- Schroeder v. BenzIllinois Supreme Court· 1956-11-26· cited 20×
- In Re Estate of TaggartAppellate Court of Illinois· 1973-11-14· cited 19×
- La Salle National Bank v. MacDonaldIllinois Supreme Court· 1954-03-17· cited 18×
- Hoge v. HogeIllinois Supreme Court· 1959-09-24· cited 18×
- Continental Illinois National Bank v. LlewellynAppellate Court of Illinois· 1966-01-25· cited 16×
- Warren-Boynton State Bank v. WallbaumIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-05-18· cited 13×
- FIREMEN'S INS. CO. OF NEWARK v. NewellAppellate Court of Illinois· 1956-06-19· cited 5×
- First National Bank v. WilmotAppellate Court of Illinois· 1971-12-15· cited 4×
- CITY BANK & TRUST CO. IN DIXON v. MorrisseyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1983-10-07· cited 3×
- Anthony Co. v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1959-02-03· cited 3×
- Arnold v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court· 1962-09-28· cited 3×
- Bank of America, N.A. v. JudevineAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-03-17· cited 2×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dahmer v. WenslerIllinois Supreme Court· 1932-10-22· cited 60×
- Butler v. HuestisIllinois Supreme Court· 1873-09-15· cited 47×
- In Re Estate of ReeveIllinois Supreme Court· 1946-03-20· cited 39×
- Highley v. DeaneIllinois Supreme Court· 1897-11-01· cited 35×
- Lydick v. TateIllinois Supreme Court· 1942-09-25· cited 28×
- Appleton v. ReaIllinois Supreme Court· 1945-01-17· cited 25×
- Richardson v. RoneyIllinois Supreme Court· 1943-03-18· cited 19×
- Murphy v. WesthoffIllinois Supreme Court· 1944-03-21· cited 19×
- Sauls v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court· 1946-05-21· cited 12×
- Hayden v. McNameeIllinois Supreme Court· 1945-11-21· cited 11×
- Hempstead v. HempsteadIllinois Supreme Court· 1918-10-21· cited 11×
- Bundy v. SolonIllinois Supreme Court· 1943-09-24· cited 8×
- Kaup v. WeathersIllinois Supreme Court· 1922-04-19· cited 3×
- Depler v. DyerIllinois Supreme Court· 1924-04-14· cited 3×
- Churchill v. FlemingIllinois Supreme Court· 1934-10-24· cited 2×
Other cases named Cahill v. Cahill
18 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Cahill v. CahillAppellate Court of Illinois· 1942-11-17· cited 16×
- Cahill v. CahillWisconsin Supreme Court· 1965-01-05· cited 4×
- Cahill v. CahillNew Jersey Court of Chancery· 1901-07-15· cited 4×
- Cahill v. CahillDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-05-22· cited 2×
- Cahill v. CahillNew York Supreme Court· 1927-12-27· cited 2×
- Cahill v. CahillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1954-12-06· cited 1×
- Cahill v. CahillSupreme Court· 2002-03-18
- Cahill v. CahillCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2000-01-14
- Cahill v. CahillNevada Supreme Court· 2007-11-16
- Cahill v. CahillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1978-11-21
- Cahill v. CahillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-06-30
- Cahill v. CahillSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2018-02-23
- Cahill v. CahillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-03
- Cahill v. CahillSupreme Court· 2014-01-21
- Cahill v. CahillSupreme Court· 2014-03-10
- Cahill v. CahillAppellate Court of Illinois· 1917-04-16
- Cahill v. CahillSupreme Court· 2002-03-18
- Cahill v. CahillSupreme Court· 2002-03-18
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.