Cagle v. Hutto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the PLRA is intended to “remove the federal district courts from the business of supervising the day-to-day operation” of prisons
• concluding that a district court “may, in its discretion conduct a pretermination evidentiary hearing,” but a district court “must hold such a hearing when the party opposing termination alleges specific facts which, if true, would amount to a current and ongoing constitutional violation.”
• pre-termination evidentiary hearing is discretionary unless party opposing termination alleges specific facts amounting to current and ongoing constitutional violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).