Cagle v. Burns and Roe, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the IIA does not bar a tort action against an employer for wrongful termination of employment
• holding that the IIA does not bar a tort action against an employer for wrongful termination of employment
• stating in dicta that the IIA does not bar an action for emotional distress resulting from wrongful termination of employment because the injury does not result while the employee is \'acting in the course of employment\'
• damages for_emotional distress are recoverable for the intentional tort of wrongful termination in violation of public policy
• damages for emotional distress are recoverable for the intentional tort of wrongful termination in violation of public policy
• damages for emotional distress are recoverable in tort action based on wrongful termination in violation of public policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).