Cage v. Harrisonburg Department of Social Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Cage erroneously asserted a “right” to visit his children, notwithstanding the termination of all parental rights
• “When a court orders termination of parental rights, the ties between the parent and child are severed forever[,] and the parent becomes ‘a legal stranger to the child.’” (quoting Martin v. Pittsylvania Cnty. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 3 Va. App. 15, 20 (1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).