Skip to main content
· 1/18/2006

Caffey v. Cook

Citations

  • 409 F. Supp. 2d 484
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2090
  • 2006 WL 132076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he Second Circuit has declined to define explicitly what sorts of proof are necessary to show joint intent, perhaps because the test of co-authorship intent will vary depending on the specific factual circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.