· 6/24/1991
Cafe Associates, Ltd. v. Gerngross
Citations
- 406 S.E.2d 162
- 305 S.C. 6
- 1991 S.C. LEXIS 129
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that contracts executed by the same parties for the same purpose and during the course of the same transaction should be read together
- enforcing five mile radius and five year time restraint on activities of former owner of restaurant
- enforcing five-mile radius and five-year time restraint on activities of former owner of restaurant
- in ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the evidence and the inferences which can be drawn therefrom should be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party
- summary judgment is appropriate only when it is clear that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
- “As a general rule, written contracts are to be construed by the Court; but where a contract is ambiguous or capable of more than one construction, the question of what the parties intended becomes one of fact, and the question should be submitted to the jury.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Finney, Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.