Cafe 207, Inc., a Florida Corporation v. St. Johns County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing a First Amendment claim: “Whether the district court’s determination of [substantial likelihood of success] is right or wrong, the record be- fore us indicates no abuse of discretion.”
• addressing substantial likelihood of success on a First Amendment claim: “Whether the district court’s determination of this point is right or wrong, the record before us indicates no abuse of discretion.”
• “Whether the district court’s determination of this point [substantial likelihood of success] is right or wrong, the record before us indicates no abuse of discretion.”
• “Whether the district court’s determination of this point [substantial likelihood of success] is right or wrong, the record here indicates no abuse of discretion.”
• “A preliminary injunction is a drastic remedy and [the movant] bears the burden to clearly establish each of the four prerequisites.”
• “Whether the district court’s determination of this point [i.e., substantial likelihood of success] is right or wrong, the record here indicates no abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).