Skip to main content
· 7/8/1994

CAE Vanguard, Inc. v. Newman

Citations

  • 518 N.W.2d 652
  • 246 Neb. 334
  • 9 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1307
  • 1994 Neb. LEXIS 156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “[t]he provision of the agreement which states that a court may reform the covenant is of no effect. Private parties may not confer upon the court powers which it does not possess.”
  • holding “[t]he provision of the agreement which states that a court may reform the covenant is of no effect. Private parties may not confer upon the court powers which it does not possess.”
  • finding a contract provision permitting reformation “is of no effect ... parties may not confer upon the court powers which it does not possess”
  • reversing trial court’s reformation of unreasonable covenant; stating that it is not the court’s function to reform unreasonable covenants, and that contract provision inviting such reformation may not confer on a court a power it does not possess
  • reversing trial court’s reformation of unreasonable covenant; stating that it is not the court’s function to reform unreasonable covenants, and that a contract provision inviting such reformation may not confer on a court a power it does not possess

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Fahrnbruch, Lanphier, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.