Cae, Incorporated v. Clean Air Engineering, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court properly discounted four calls as de minimis
• noting that, under the Lanham Act, the elements for trademark infringement are the same as unfair competition
• finding that marks were indistinguishable where both parties used them in combination with the names of the their departments
• finding that marks were indistinguishable where both parties used them in combination with the names of the their departments
• concluding marks that were “indistinguishable” and “virtually identical” weighed in favor of finding a likelihood of confusion
• stating that the area-and-manner-of use factor “assesses whether there is a relationship in use, promotion, distribution, or sales between the goods or services of the parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).