Cady v. Tuttle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that regulatory compliance costs are unrecoverable and therefore amount to irreparable harm “because federal agencies generally enjoy sovereign immunity for any monetary damages”
• observing that the costs to comply with agency action are almost always irreparable “because federal agencies generally enjoy sovereign immunity for any monetary damages”
• observing agency did not claim recoverable compliance costs “probably because federal agencies generally enjoy sovereign immunity for any monetary damages”
• noting the plaintiffs lacked “an avenue to recover costs from complying with the Order” because “federal agencies generally enjoy sovereign immunity for any monetary damages.”
• compliance costs not reparable “because federal agencies generally enjoy sovereign immunity for any monetary damages”
• compliance costs not reparable “because federal agencies generally enjoy sovereign immunity for any monetary damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).