Cady v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that dog alert to vehicle was insufficient to establish probable cause for search of passenger
• holding that the police did not have probable cause to search the defendant simply because a dog alerted to the vehicle that the defendant had been a passenger in
• finding that dog’s alert to the passenger seat after the defendant had exited the vehicle did not give the police probable cause to believe the defendant had drugs on his person

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gibson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2005-02-18· cited 51×
• I.R.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-15· cited 33×
• State v. Griffin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-20· cited 14×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-23· cited 5×
• Perry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-03· cited 3×
• Rehm v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-05· cited 2×
• Reyes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-11· cited 2×
• IRC v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-15
• State of Iowa v. Yale Stevens
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2022-02-18

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rogers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-14· cited 33×
• Rennard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-14· cited 16×
• Bryant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-25· cited 8×