Skip to main content
· 12/22/1890

Cadwalader v. Partridge

Citations

  • 137 U.S. 553
  • 11 S. Ct. 182
  • 34 L. Ed. 783
  • 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2118

Syllabus

<p>Merritt v. Cameron, ante, 542, affirmed and followed.</p> <p>A change in the ruling of the Treasury Department whereby merchandise in bond, such as is involved in this case, is held dutiable at a greatly reduced rate, is of no aid to an importer who has not protested against the previous ruling.</p> <p>This was an action against the collector of the port of Philadelphia to recover duties alleged to have been illegally-exacted.' Judgment for the plaintiffs, to review which the defendant sued out this writ of error. The case is stated in the opinion.</p>

Judges: Lamar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.