Skip to main content
· 11/18/2015

Cadriel, Aroldo Humberto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an assumption based on “unfounded speculation” was inadequate to establish an articulable basis to believe that a third party would be inside a home
  • indicating that suppression is not warranted where the causal link between an initial illegality and subsequent consent is \sufficiently attenuated\
  • refusing to reverse a conviction under harmless-error review where there was \overwhelming\ evidence of the defendant's guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.