Cadle Company II, Inc. v. Superior Construction & Contracting, Inc. (In Re Rice)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that § 8.01-268 “was amended in 1988 to make clear that it applies only when an interest in land is involved in the litigation, and not when the object is only to obtain a money judgment”
• explaining that § 8.01-268 “was amended in 1988 to make clear that it applies only when an interest in land is involved in the litigation, and not when the object is only to obtain a money judgment”
• allowing lis pendens based on veil-piercing action to collect on a prepetition judgment against a debtor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).