Connecticut Appellate Court· 10/28/2008
Cadle Co. v. D'ADDARIO
Citations
- 957 A.2d 536
- 111 Conn. App. 80
- 2008 Conn. App. LEXIS 487
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘in determining whether a case is ripe, a trial court must be satisfied that the case before [it] does not present a hypothetical injury or a claim contingent upon some event that has not and indeed may never transpire’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bishop, Gruendel, Foti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lee v. Harlow, Adams and Friedman, PCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-08-04· cited 11×
- In Re Probate Appeal of Cadle Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-07-05· cited 4×
- Pelc v. Southington Dental Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2025-05-06· cited 3×
- Orlando v. LiburdConnecticut Appellate Court· 2024-09-10· cited 1×
- Orlando v. LiburdSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2026-01-06· cited 1×
- Board of Education v. BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court· 2019-07-23
- Presto v. PrestoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-02-25
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-07-22· cited 105×
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-11-03· cited 81×
- Mayer v. Biafore, Florek & O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-06-09· cited 62×
- Office of the Governor v. Select Committee of InquirySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-18· cited 46×
- Weiner v. ClintonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-04-24· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.